I am noticing a pattern among those who consider themselves “social media savvy,” “early-adopters” and “jedi ninjas” or whatever the new term of the week may happen to be.
On one hand, they say there are no rules with social media. They call it the wild, wild, west and offer advice that pretty much says “go out there, try some stuff and see if it sticks.” I like that, and I think it’s important to convey a message of experimentation.
But then they go off on a tangent about what people shouldn’t do, act as if their way for managing Twitter accounts, Facebook accounts and fan pages, blogs and a slew of other platforms is the only way and anyone doing it differently is breaking the code.
So, there are no rules, but there is a code? WTH?
I am the first person to silently grumble about those who use their Facebook accounts as an outlet for their twitter streams and not much else, but who am I to tell them that it isn’t effective? I can simply hide them from my feed or un-friend them, right?
No, I don’t want to join a Mafia family and I don’t choose to learn which car best describes me or which game from the 80’s I am still able to play. But that’s me. Some people enjoy that and it’s their prerogative. And they could be reaching thier goals with those tactics.
I do wholeheartedly believe that communities develop a culture somewhat inorganically and that newcomers who don’t understand the culture can have a hard time, but that is pretty much how it works in branded communities. You can’t expect 300 million users to subscribe to the same culture.
I was a panelist at Meet the New Media, at NC State last week when a member of the audience expressed concern over stalkers following her. One of the panelists gave her a very detailed method of determining whether or not someone is worth following.
It included a series of events and involved a formula of comparing the number of followers against the number of people the suspected stalker is following, dividing that by pi, and multiplying it by Avogadro’s Number. The results would then determine whether or not this person would show up on her doorstep wielding a knife in the wee hours of the night.
Okay, I’m being facetious and I hope my fellow panelist sees the humor if he is indeed reading this post.
But, I felt compelled to grab the mic after him and my advice to her was to not worry about it or over-think it. I told her to look at their profile and if there is something that seems suspect, block them, especially the porn-types. But if the point is to grow your community, broaden your reach and learn from the masses, you can’t sweat the stalkers, and you certainly can’t worry about every new follower.
Because we all know that if a stalker wants you, they’ll find you. They can just head on over to LinkedIn, find out where you work, and get you in the parking lot. With all the information we are readily providing across social media, stalkers no longer need mad investigative skills to be effective.
So, if you’ve told anyone that they are failing at social media, find a new message. Failure is subjective and it really has no place in the Wild, Wild West. Enlighten them, don’t put them down. Offer new suggestions. And remember: Failing to see the point is not an indication of failure. Perhaps they’ve never been told about the benefits. So tell them.
After all, you are a jedi-ninja, so do your thing and welcome them to the wild, wild west.

Subscribe in a reader
Subscribe to Online Community Strategist by Email
Why did you post that comment?
September 19, 2009 in comments, online communities | Tags: news comments, online news comments, story comments, terms of service | 18 comments
This is the question I wanted to ask the woman who called asking me to remove a comment, actually several comments, she’d posted on a news story.
Wait, let me be honest and tell you that after a ten minute conversation I did ask her that question. And her answer, though lame, is a common answer provided by those who experience commenter’s remorse and go to great lengths to find the person who can actually remove them - ME. First they email, then they call. The call comes first if the comment is particularly troublesome.
The woman I’m talking about in this instance said she was caught up in the moment and couldn’t help herself. Yes, go back and read that sentence again. She couldn’t help herself from posting a comment that could possibly jeopardize her job. She’d posted some telling information on a crime story about the suspect, and guess what? She had that information because she works at the hospital where he was treated.
Some common sense in this situation would have gone a long way.
It would not have taken Nancy Drew to solve that case had it become an issue or if it leaked that the information was on the site.
Since this woman was nearly in tears, I removed all four of the comments, but not before encouraging her to be more careful and making her understand that it was a complete courtesy on my part because it is not our policy to remove comments and we are not obligated to honor her request.
But in this economy, I don’t want to see anyone lose their job and if I could do my part by removing four comments, so be it.
But just when I thought she understood my message and would take heed, she asked me to ban her account completely because she couldn’t be sure she wouldn’t do it again.
I was floored.
Can we get a little self-control with that common sense?
RELATED POSTS