<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A study of 600,000 Facebook fan pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.angelaconnor.com/2009/12/09/a-study-of-600000-facebook-fan-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.angelaconnor.com/2009/12/09/a-study-of-600000-facebook-fan-pages/</link>
	<description>Angela Connor on Growing Successful Online Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagmar Cameron</title>
		<link>http://blog.angelaconnor.com/2009/12/09/a-study-of-600000-facebook-fan-pages/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dagmar Cameron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angelaconnor.com/?p=1673#comment-9170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing I&#039;ve noticed is there are plenty of misconceptions regarding the banking institutions intentions if talking about property foreclosure. One fairy tale in particular would be the fact the bank desires your house. The lending company wants your hard earned dollars, not the home. They want the cash they loaned you having interest. Steering clear of the bank will draw a new foreclosed summary. Thanks for your write-up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;ve noticed is there are plenty of misconceptions regarding the banking institutions intentions if talking about property foreclosure. One fairy tale in particular would be the fact the bank desires your house. The lending company wants your hard earned dollars, not the home. They want the cash they loaned you having interest. Steering clear of the bank will draw a new foreclosed summary. Thanks for your write-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motherhood maternity</title>
		<link>http://blog.angelaconnor.com/2009/12/09/a-study-of-600000-facebook-fan-pages/#comment-7537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[motherhood maternity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angelaconnor.com/?p=1673#comment-7537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You ought to participate in a contest for among the top blogs on the web. I will suggest this site!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ought to participate in a contest for among the top blogs on the web. I will suggest this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark @ AlchemyUnited.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.angelaconnor.com/2009/12/09/a-study-of-600000-facebook-fan-pages/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark @ AlchemyUnited.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.angelaconnor.com/?p=1673#comment-2755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allow me to play devil&#039;s advocate for a moment...

1) These lump&#039;em-all-togher type &quot;studies&quot; are quite often meaningless. Any insights get lost in the generalizations and over simplifications. What&#039;s more helpful is case studies, recommended best practices, etc. In short, specifics that are actionable and ideally have some relevance to one&#039;s particular industry/niche.

2) Quantity is an old-media measurement. Its myth of value in &quot;new media&quot; needs to be put to rest. No doubt there is sometimes value in shot gun blast but the true value in 2010 is sniper fire (i.e., quality). Getting the right fans - much like page visits, community members, etc. - should be the objective. Racking up number might impress the boss but if that doesn&#039;t accomplish the goals of the brand then what good is it? 

In short, this &quot;study&quot; is misleading at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to play devil&#8217;s advocate for a moment&#8230;</p>
<p>1) These lump&#8217;em-all-togher type &#8220;studies&#8221; are quite often meaningless. Any insights get lost in the generalizations and over simplifications. What&#8217;s more helpful is case studies, recommended best practices, etc. In short, specifics that are actionable and ideally have some relevance to one&#8217;s particular industry/niche.</p>
<p>2) Quantity is an old-media measurement. Its myth of value in &#8220;new media&#8221; needs to be put to rest. No doubt there is sometimes value in shot gun blast but the true value in 2010 is sniper fire (i.e., quality). Getting the right fans &#8211; much like page visits, community members, etc. &#8211; should be the objective. Racking up number might impress the boss but if that doesn&#8217;t accomplish the goals of the brand then what good is it? </p>
<p>In short, this &#8220;study&#8221; is misleading at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

